![\"American](\"http:\/\/americanherald.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/American-Herald-Logo-Grey.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/a><\/p>\nGoldman and IDG Put $50 Million to Work in a Bitcoin Company<\/span><\/h1>\nThe Wall Street bank announced late\u00a0Wednesday\u00a0that it had struck a partnership with a major Chinese<\/span> investment firm, IDG Capital Partners, to lead a $50 million investment into Circle Internet Financial<\/a>, a start-up that aims to use the technology underlying Bitcoin to improve consumer payments.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\nThen another article came up that was published on Jun 28, 2014<\/span>:<\/span> LINK<\/a><\/p>\n“That bill [also referred to as AB-129]\u2013 as we\u2019ve discussed previously \u2014 effectively makes it simpler for state residents to use alternative currencies by nullifying an old bill that deemed anything but the use of the United States dollar as legal.<\/span><\/p>\nThese alternative currencies include but are not limited to Starbucks Stars, Amazon Coins, and yes, even bitcoin<\/span> and other cryptographic currencies.”<\/span><\/p>\nThen another article was found that was published on <\/span>May 6, 2014:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span> LINK<\/a><\/p>\nThe Big Picture Behind the News of China\u2019s Bitcoin Bans<\/span><\/h1>\nThis is the most peculiar part of these articles: Look at the dates!<\/span><\/p>\nCalifornia must have had a crystal ball when it came to that legislation dealing with crypto currency. China bans bitcoin and a month and a half later, California passes it.<\/span><\/p>\nThen almost a year later, China and Manhattan Island go into partnership with Bitcoin. This miraculous event really benefits California in a big way or does it?<\/span><\/p>\nQuestions: <\/span><\/p>\n1: Why would Manhattan Island start backing Bitcoin? <\/span><\/p>\n2: How did California know Bitcoin was going to be backed by a Central Bank when in the article about China, the central bank there said it was not created by the central bank so therefore was not legal tender?<\/span><\/p>\n3: We know that Manhattan is a foreign country under the Charter of the Patroons, and that charter came from the Netherlands. Many people believe that Manhattan Island is a part of the United States and Manhattan Island was taken over by the British. However, the British Company that took over Manhattan Island from the Dutch Company was a franchise of the Dutch. Is Manhattan Island a part of the United States or is it the United States as opposed to one of the United States or these United States?<\/span><\/p>\n
Then another article came up that was published on Jun 28, 2014<\/span>:<\/span> LINK<\/a><\/p>\n “That bill [also referred to as AB-129]\u2013 as we\u2019ve discussed previously \u2014 effectively makes it simpler for state residents to use alternative currencies by nullifying an old bill that deemed anything but the use of the United States dollar as legal.<\/span><\/p>\n These alternative currencies include but are not limited to Starbucks Stars, Amazon Coins, and yes, even bitcoin<\/span> and other cryptographic currencies.”<\/span><\/p>\n Then another article was found that was published on <\/span>May 6, 2014:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span> LINK<\/a><\/p>\n This is the most peculiar part of these articles: Look at the dates!<\/span><\/p>\n California must have had a crystal ball when it came to that legislation dealing with crypto currency. China bans bitcoin and a month and a half later, California passes it.<\/span><\/p>\n Then almost a year later, China and Manhattan Island go into partnership with Bitcoin. This miraculous event really benefits California in a big way or does it?<\/span><\/p>\n Questions: <\/span><\/p>\n 1: Why would Manhattan Island start backing Bitcoin? <\/span><\/p>\n 2: How did California know Bitcoin was going to be backed by a Central Bank when in the article about China, the central bank there said it was not created by the central bank so therefore was not legal tender?<\/span><\/p>\n 3: We know that Manhattan is a foreign country under the Charter of the Patroons, and that charter came from the Netherlands. Many people believe that Manhattan Island is a part of the United States and Manhattan Island was taken over by the British. However, the British Company that took over Manhattan Island from the Dutch Company was a franchise of the Dutch. Is Manhattan Island a part of the United States or is it the United States as opposed to one of the United States or these United States?<\/span><\/p>\nThe Big Picture Behind the News of China\u2019s Bitcoin Bans<\/span><\/h1>\n