Published on 04-05-2016 by the American Herald
International Public Notice
As keepers of the constitution for the United States of America it is the duty of the Keepers to inform the people.
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!
The Government of The United States of America published a International Public Notice on 03-30-2016 about supporting the people in a certain action taken: LINK
Upon further investigation into and county grand juries, it is an obligation to inform the people on some findings by the Government of The United States of America when it comes to the subject matter of the grand jury.
First: There is an organization doing business as National Liberty Alliance “NLA”. Their interpretation of a certain case known as:
UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
504 U.S. 36 (112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352)
UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
No. 90-1972.
Argued: Jan. 22, 1992. Decided: May 4, 1992. LINK
is being addressed in this presentation.
There are some liberties taken by NLA that does not exist within the case cited and used as a foundation of the organizations activities.
The first paragraph of a document published by NLA reveals quite a bit about the mind set of the organization. LINK
Quote: “We the people have been providentially provided legal recourse to address the criminal conduct of persons themselves entrusted to dispense justice. In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed. 2d 352 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.” end quote
NLA claims: “Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people.”
This next quote is what the case really says:
“Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,” Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490, 80 S.Ct. 1502, 1544, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It ” ‘is a constitutional fixture in its own right.’ ” United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977). In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218, 80 S.Ct. 270, 273, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960);”
The case makes no reference that the grand jury belonged to the people, it said that the grand jury serves as kind of a buffer, but “kind” could mean anything.
Next quote by NLA:
“It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.”
1: If an entity is not textually assigned, it cannot be a fourth branch of anything.
2: If the grand jury is not textually assigned and claims sovereignty and independence, it cannot claim power of attorney on and behalf of the American people. This claim by NLA violates the political rights of everyone and multiple power of attorney contracts that many people have all over the country. Further, the Bill of Rights was created to protect the States from the federal, not to protect the people. A federal construct is a union of states, wherein a National Government is a Government of people.
The whole theory of people coming together as a group and calling itself a grand jury on a county level does not hold water without the authority of the people. Further, for a group of people to come together and claim power of attorney for the whole country is what is known as communism.
On the other hand, a grand jury under the 5th amendment of a Bill of Rights being controlled by a private membership association “PMA” (Bar Association members) has created a situation where the PMA can manipulate many courses of action on behalf of one organization over another whether the targeted party is guilty or not. Further, that power of the 5th amendment grand jury can also be used by secret societies because of the nature of its creation requires secrecy and independence. Once independent and secret, it has nothing to do with the people it investigates and jurisdiction can be challenged as to whether the particular grand jury has any rights whatsoever due to the nature of its proceedings. The grand jury has to be assigned to a particular people before it has authority.
A grand jury is not any different then a private court operated by a private membership association. If the grand jury is not textually assigned to anything other then itself, then the interpretation of its existence is flawed.
On page 48, Scalia writes, “The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation” and later, discussing compelling witness behavior he writes the grand jury must “appeal to the court when such compulsion is required.”
Scalia says the grand jury needs no authority from its constituting court to investigate but clearly, the grand jury needs the authority of the constituting court to exist. That is what constituting means…to create, authorize, establish, etc.
NLA can’t claim it is the U.S. courts, as they have grand juries of their own.
So, to come together as a group with no court recognition is not a grand jury…it’s a political organization mis-representing itself as a judicial body. The same can be said about a Bar Association, a private membership association running courts not recognized by the Bill of Rights nor any constitution. By both organizations claiming power of attorney for the American people renders both political parties communists and fascists. There are too many human rights violations to mention in this article, however, anyone familiar with human rights can determine within a few minutes how many human rights are being violated when it comes to how the grand jury process is being used by the Bar Association and the NLA.
SOLUTION
The only way to solve the problems that have been created by both aforementioned organizations is to write the grand jury into a county charter that the people have voted on and agree that no private membership associations are going to run or hijack their county government. Then pass an ordinance that the county cannot give money to any district judge if in fact the people want district judges in existence in their county. Isn’t it funny that the idea of writing a grand jury into existence that serves an assembly of the people on the county level never crossed the minds of either organization nor attempted to define “textually assigned”.
Just as human rights are used as political weapons internationally, so is the grand jury used as a political weapon within the U.S.
Example county charter link
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!
04-05-2016
