Introducing The Private Membership Association Classification Act of 2017!



Upon the motion of the National assembly, the United States, in Congress assembled passed The Private Membership Association Classification Act of 2017 for the benefit of American Nationals and residents of The United States of America. LINK

The whole controversy and debate for the last 20 years is now resolved with clear definitions and classifications.

Now the Attorney’s don’t have to smear the reputation of people that claim certain things about the all cap name controversy and the people that have been trying to figure it out don’t have to guess anymore. Problem resolved!


Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg commits act of war against the Government of The United States of America!



On or about 06-19-2017, Mark Zuckerberg, head of Face Book and CEO arbitrarily decided to disable the feature that allows the Government of The United States of America to post messages on its business pages.

Mark Zuckerberg has not contacted the Government of The United States of America in anyway, shape or form to explain the reasons for this act of war. The act was simply done.

Mark Zuckerberg did not take the business pages off of Face Book, so no one knows what has happened meaning that the act of war has been hidden by Mark Zuckerberg.

The reason why the Government of The United States of America calls this an act of war is because Mark Zuckerberg was instrumental in the over throw of the Egyptian Democratically elected Government which caused many acts of human rights violations and many war crimes against the people of Egypt. LINK

Here are some definitions of war crimes: LINK

If anyone reads that aforementioned article, it clearly shows that Mark Zuckerberg was instrumental in the take over of the Egyptian Government through a group called ” The Facebook Kids”. This is called a War Crime committed by Mark Zuckerberg.

Mark Zuckerberg has announced last month that he was going to take it upon himself to decide what constitutes Hate Speech outside of any court or Government in the world. LINK

Mark Zuckerberg has become the definition of despotism. Mark Zuckerberg has become an enemy of The United States of America and the United States because his takeover of the Egyptian Government was on behalf of Islam. The takeover of Egypt by Islam caused multiple war crimes against the people of Egypt wherein Mark Zuckerberg is directly responsible.

The use of Face Book by the Government of The United States of America was a form of monitoring the company which is the right and under the authority of the United States, in Congress assembled.

Mark Zuckerberg is hereby under investigation for War Crimes in many countries in the world because of his direct affect on the general populace. Yes, it is a private company that has affected many political movements that have had a very negative affect on the world itself. Once the private company went political, it is now a public company and therefore it is liable to the law of nations, war crimes and multiple human rights violations under the direction of one Mark Zuckerberg.

To put this situation simply, Mark Zuckerberg is forcing his own personal political will by charter, in an attempt to arbitrarily control the speech of millions of people, which violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights thereby hiring a contracted mercenary force to enforce his own political will through his company, the same way he did in Egypt.

Mark Zuckerberg’s days of tyranny will be over soon.


The United States of America is declared a free State!



The people for The United States of America hereby declare The United States of America a free State for the purposes of defining itself as a free country and free of des-potism within its metes and bounds of its territory as defined within the Articles of Confederation, as amended May 5th, 2015.

The definition of a free State included the original 13 (thirteen) colonies and those States that did not include slavery within its laws. However, the 50 (fifty) American States that became independent States derived from the status of the original 13 (thirteen) States have not operated as independent States and or free States since the inception of a foreign constitution and have not freed themselves from despotism for over 240 (two hundred and forty) years. The foreign constitution has within its wording and has been implemented to operate as a permanent Military occupation of The United States of America. The foreign constitution further violates the Law of Nations due to the fact that a Military occupation does not grant legal rights to the occupier to change the status of the people as one of its citizens.

What about the States of the Union? The States of the Union are within the territory of The United States of America and will function as free States when ready and able other wise their independence will derive from The United States of America until fully apprised of the Law of Nations and able to carry on their own international relations. The Union stays in tact under the Articles of Association of 1774 as amended in the present time.

“State” simply meant country from 1760 to present time;and “free” always meant free from despotism, rather than from some other country.

Now therefore, with this declaration in mind, there are certain rights that accompany free States and shall be enforced by the Government of The United States of America through legal and lawful means for the security of the next generation.

What does this mean?

1: The definition of a state as defined in 1864 by the municipal government of the District of Columbia is hereby abolished within The United States of America and the States of the union.

2: The charter of the judges is hereby deported in accordance with the Law of Nations.

3: This declaration removes resident alien status under a foreign power from the people thereby granting first in time and first in right status to choose their own status and destiny.

4: The lieutenancy of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem are occupiers of a foreign country in direct conflict with the James Monroe Doctrine of 1823 and the Law of Nations thereby implementing an illegal trade embargo against the National Currency of the country. The illegal embargo is being implemented inside a box created on paper called a domestic jurisdiction and barring a National currency to be traded within it. This declaration holds the lieutenancy of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem liable for these damages against The United States of America.

There are many other changes that will take place as this reality is realized after being notice of its existence. We will keep everyone notified of any updates and or resolutions that occur.


Globalists stage a pathetic opposition to Act for America sharia Law Protests!



People often suspect that most news is fake. Take a look at what we found based on that suspicion:

Take a look folks, all of the stories across America are the same stories with almost the exact same wording when it comes to Southern Poverty Law Center. The all say basically the same thing that Southern Poverty Law Center recognizes Act for America as a hate Group

The newspapers and Southern Poverty Law Center all around the country classify protecting women’s rights, protecting women from genital mutilation, protecting human rights, protecting freedom of speech and many other basic rights as “Hate”. They all quote Southern Poverty Law Center which is nothing more than a political organization that has never filed a lawsuit on behalf of anyone for the protection of their rights and in fact they file law suits that are purely political or anything that advances their socialist and communist agenda. In other words, the reputation of the Southern Poverty Law Center is so bad that it has to use the good name of other organizations to gain free press. Further, the Human Rights Tribunal has international warrants for the arrest of most of the Southern Poverty Law Centers office holders for violating multiple human rights across the board. Southern Poverty Law Center has been listed in many human rights suits heard by the Human Rights Tribunal, however they are protected by George Soros through the U.S. Department of Justice that are simply harboring human rights violators and international criminals

The reality is that under Sharia Law, women cannot vote, they cannot drive, they cannot go in public without a brother or other male family member or husband escorting them, they cannot go to school or anything else. The woman in the last newspaper clipping is a fake Muslim because she is in violation of Sharia Law for being in public and speaking. Muslim men do not speak to women directly. If the women do not wear a hijab, the men can legally rape them with no recourse for the woman.

All of these woman that are not Muslim that are supporting Islam and Sharia Law in the name of accusing people of being racists are in violation of Sharia Law. Under Sharia Law they need to wear a hijab on their head and if they refuse, they could be stoned to death while buried up to their waste in the dirt.

Most communist men that are claiming others to be fascists are the first to be killed when Sharia Law takes hold in a country. Their wives and daughters will be sold at a market as slaves to produce offspring for the Islamic Military.

There are 58 examples of these claims because the same thing happened in 58 other countries that have been taken over by Islam and Sharia Law in the past 50 years. The protestors for Act for America were not outnumbered in anyway. Go look at some of the videos and you will see who the police were protecting and who they were protecting against.

The reality about the news media in America is that they are all one newspaper in many different names controlled by a few men that love to play with countries as a sport with real consequences for everyone else. In some countries they call it a blood sport much like the old Roman Empire.

This first picture is filled with actors advertising for a Socialist Newspaper and we still cannot identify the woman in the baseball cap and glasses. She looks like she is famous but we cannot place her. Further, under Sharia Law these women would be publicly beaten or even executed for not wearing hijabs.(head dress or burka). As a matter of fact, all of the women advocating for Sharia Law in the name of accusing others for being racist are in pure violation of Sharia Law on a daily basis. By not obeying Sharia Law, these women are mocking Islam and Mohammad by openly disobeying Allah and can be raped legally under Sharia Law.

All of these women that are fighting for Sharia Law from the Universities are also mocking Sharia Law, Allah and Mohammad because they are not in compliance with Sharia Law by going to school and not staying home to have babies and service her husband.

The woman in charge of Southern Poverty Law Center is also in violation of Sharia Law because she does not wear the hijab, and also does not stay home to service her husband. Under Sharia Law, she should have been married by age nine and a mother by age 13 or sooner and her genitals should have been mutilated under Sharia Law before her first period or she sold on the open market.

All people that advocate for Sharia Law under the guise of racism are all in violation of Sharia Law and mock Allah, Mohammad and Islam on a daily basis which is the reason for their executions when Islam takes hold of a country.

The women in the first picture are not supposed to be mixed with the men and showing cleavage or wearing shorts. All of these violations of Sharia Law carry a penalty of public beating, stoning, rape or public torture and death for simply wearing certain clothing.
A woman cannot pray in public, and is supposed to be covered from head to toe with an net over their eyes to see through according to Sharia Law. Be careful what you wish for in this world

ABC News advertisement

Boston Globe

Chicago Tribune


Fox 4 News


LA Times

NBC News


Seattle News

Socialists Worker news

US News

Washington Post

Washington Post


A pathetic propaganda video from Southern Poverty Law Center and their communist supporters to demonize freedom and equal rights

Source LINK


Intangible Property

PUBLISHED BY the American Herald ON 06-09-2017

Written by Karen

Good day, to all of you faithful readers of the American Herald. I am honored to be a contributing Editor. I hope that you all will join me in making the American Herald the number one Newspaper in this great Nation.

Today we are covering the topic of “intangible property.” Webster defines intangible property as something intangible; specific: an asset (as goodwill) that is not corporeal. Not corporeal? You say, what does that mean? Well, Webster states that that means it is an asset without a material physical body. It is not not spiritual, and we all know that two nots represent a positive. So in other words, it is spiritual. Corporeal means substantial. Not immaterial. So, let us cut to the chase.

Intangible property is literally any thought, idea, or decision that is made on a personal level; on the canvas of the soul or mind. It is the seed that precedes the action that manifests into the material realm. It truly is just that simple. It is the first seed, if you will, that only becomes evident when it is acted upon. This could also include patents, trademarks, trade names, or copyrights. It is intellectual property. This is not a difficult concept when you consider what is private among parties, what is public, and what is strictly personal. In law, some of this intangible property rights are preconceived in the public realm. Where upon we’ve all agree to some intangible property rights, for example, grandparent’s rights. The problem is that statutory policies have been slanted to destroy intangible property rights, or personal choice, in favor of public policy. In other words, public policy has attempted to take a priority, and in some cases eliminate personal choice all together. Interesting of note, is that while researching various subjects, it is evident that many legal web sites do not even mention intangible property rights. If you’ll notice, they often skip over the concept.

Let us know what you think about this topic. Please feel free to leave your comments below. This article is not meant for legal advice. Any U.S. statutes are intentionally mute.

Political correctness is used to control our intangible property rights to language

A couple keywords to keep in mind while you read:

Tangible property: Property that you can own and hold and see and touch.

Intangible property: Property you own and can’t see, hold or touch. The right to use your tangible property. Like being able to drive your car whenever you’d like.

Do you know what it’s like to be silenced? Silenced until you compromise yourself and your beliefs to fit into what people think is politically correct or the “right way”?

Being politically correct is apparently more important than life itself. Somehow our intangible property right has shifted from certain words to other words without our knowledge or consent.

I had the exclusive intangible property right to a book blog. Sometime into it I started looking for a co-blogger to help me with upkeep and posting. When I decided on a blogger I specifically told said blogger in an e-mail that I don’t read or blog about the LGBT+ genre and community and if they agreed not to write about this subject among others on my blog I would gladly share my online space to write with me.

On their first post this blogger wrote a bit in their post about their sexual orientation. When I asked for them to remove it before publishing; this blogger questioned my exclusive intangible property rights to my blog.

The subject matter was personal information about this blogger I didn’t want on my blog. This blogger kept pushing and pushing for this topic to be put on my blog.

I stood my ground and said no. That was my blog and my space and they had their own blog to write about whatever they’d like. This blogger ended up quitting and proceeded to spread rumors about me because I wouldn’t give into their attempt to shift and control my intangible property rights to my blog. This blogger baited and switched me in an effort to control the direction of my intangible property to other political beliefs and agree to bend the terms and conditions that this blogger already agreed to prior to accepting the position as co-writer.

This blogger attempted to take away exclusive intangible property to my blog by attempting to control my intangible property right to specific words which formed beliefs that were not within the parameters of my own conscience.

I had a friend who was very angry at the world.

This friend would pick a fight with anyone who said the smallest thing -intentionally or not- that didn’t match with this friends political beliefs. This friend would get angry when someone wouldn’t automatically apologize for saying the wrong thing. This friend would become angry for asking why they were mad, as if someone should already know. They’d get angry when someone asked why you had to apologize for sharing an opinion. This friend would get angry when you wouldn’t use certain terms.

A while back I exercised my exclusive right to language and unintentionally said something that went against this friends political beliefs and when they called me out on it I asked them to explain why I was “wrong”. When they explained, I realized I didn’t agree with what they were saying and I stood by what I said. This friend spent days trying to tell me I was “wrong” and that I should apologize for what I said.

This friend took away my exclusive intangible property right to language itself by telling me my opinion was wrong and that their way was the only way.

I cut these people from my life without a second thought. These kind of people are draining and manipulative and if they couldn’t respect me and my voice I wouldn’t have them in my life.

I will not be silenced. I have a voice and it will be heard.

These various cities and entities have been Nationalized by the Government of The United States of America!



The following cities and entities have been Nationalized thereby placing these cities and entities subject to the Law of Nations.

1: Shelbyville, Tennessee

2: Dearborn, Michigan

3: San Diego Unified School District

4: Bernards Township, New Jersey

and withdrawal of the Peace Agreement offer with the Grand Masters of the Masonic Lodges within The United States of America.

Further, a motion was passed to exile the following individuals due to their political decisions in the past and by their own political will:

1: Brad Anderson

2: James McBride


LINK to the official National assembly record.

Introducing the new Union Seal of 1774 to present time!



Since the Articles of Association of 1774 were amended May 15, 2017. It was appropriate to give it a new Seal so here it is:

Please keep in mind that this particular Union is a National Union rather than a private union like the teamsters or another private organization.
It is governed by the Articles of Association of 1774 as amended May 15th, 2017, LINK

If people join this Union here: LINK Sorry Globalists, no more jurisdiction.

Please read the Terms and Conditions before filling out the sign up form. Union ID Cards and Business Membership Certificates should be completed by next Monday.


The National assembly classifies Luciferianism as enemies of the country!



The National assembly heard a motion to classify Luciferianism as enemies of the country. Obviously there were no objections;and all caught are further classified as having committed the high crime of treason for nefarious acts and crimes against humanity on behalf of a foreign principality within the overlay survey called a region. It is very strange times when someone has to make that kind of motion. LINK

The National assembly also condemned the US-Saudi Arabia Military weapons deal worth nearly $325 billion for reasons of arming a nation that has committed itself to destroy the west. It seems awfully stupid to arm those people trying to kill you.

The National assembly also approved a motion to fully recognize all intangible property rights of all State residents, American Nationals and General Post Masters within The United States of America. LINK

The National assembly also agreed to give the Grand Masters of the Masonic Lodges at least 7 days to decide if they would like to go to peace with The United States of America and the Government thereof. That time period ends next Monday. We shall see. The law reads that you must go to your adversary and attempt to make peace with them so that is the reason for the Peace agreement offer.

It was a busy month and stay tuned for the next International Public Notice for updates and news.

Notice: The American Herald is seeking reporters, editors and publishers to start writing for that newspaper at: That particular newspaper does have quite a following.