PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 02-12-2019

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America hereby issues its first international notice to the U.S. Supreme Court as it pertains to an order issued under Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)!

The aforementioned order issued in 1973 was in violation of International Law and falls under the classification of genocide. 

Source: LINK

“The term “genocide” did not exist before 1944. It is a very specific term, referring to violent crimes committed against groups with the intent to destroy the existence of the group. Human rights, as laid out in the US Bill of Rights or the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, concern the rights of individuals.” 

The terms: 

1: Unborn babies

2: Fetuses

and other terms that are used to describe groups and unborn babies are in fact protected under international law long before the aforementioned order issued in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court.  LINK 

Common sense tells everyone that a pregnant woman fighting in a war on the front lines is strictly forbidden and further classifies the unborn child as innocent. Forbidding a pregnant woman from fighting in a war is for the purpose and intent of protecting the innocent.  More on this subject can be seen in a 20 minute video already filed into evidence: LINK

The decision to issue an order of placing the term abortion under the classification of Medical Procedure did nothing more then disguise the mass murder of over sixty million people and further placed all medical personnel under the liability of violating the Nuremberg principles. LINK.  Enough time has passed wherein the intent to violate international law by issuing the Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) order by the successors that had plenty of time to review its decision is very clear.

To make this first notice very clear to all who see it, the U.S. Supreme Court will be receiving a second notice of fault of this unlawful order in ten days, and then a third notice of default ten days after the second notice which is all done in this newspaper.  The U.S. Supreme Court will not be receiving anything in the mail, this publication of record is the first, second and third notice and does qualify as fulfilling International Due Process. 

Subject Matter of this notice:

In the event that the U.S. Supreme Court chooses to ignore this international notice due process and not reverse its order immediately, then the U.S. Supreme Court will have dissolved itself by committing the act of genocide, mass murder, and unlawful imprisonment of those persons found guilty of murder along with other invalidating causes in its Military capacity thereby dissolving the tripartite.

Published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America.

02-12-2019

The U.S. Supreme Court cannot say they did not know what it was doing when it issued the Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) order!

PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 02-12-2019

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The PAG’s across America have done it again. They just happen to be looking around and found some interesting rules that govern the federal judiciary.

Every case in existence whether it is in the local municipality, a state court or a federal court is open to third party investors whether the case is in the middle of a decision or not. The chief judge in every case can accept third party investors funds into what is called the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) and Disputed Ownership Fund (DOF).  It does take a Chief Judges signature to approve the investor funds that is overseen by the Registry Monitoring Group.

This means that the Chief Judge is nothing more than a Brokerage Agency for every case. LINK

Most lawyers are looking for rules of the court in the lower numbers, however they have seemed to miss those rules in the thousands and in particular: Rule 7067-1 Registry Funds- LINK

Here is another example so the readers do not think this is a fluke: LINK

Here is an alternative investment program in case someone does not want to use the CRIS system: LINK

What does this all mean?

If a defendant walks into any court room, and the Chief Judge has brokered a deal with a third party investor, this means that a ex parte meeting has occurred or maybe a judge will interpret that occurrence in some other manner under Marbury vs. Madison where judges can interpret that ex parte meeting as a country club dinner.

Either way, if the court has a chance to make millions by finding you guilty, what chance does anyone have of receiving a fair trial? or if the case is dismissed, the prosecutor has to pay out of his or her own pocket to settle the bond, what are the odds of you receiving due process or a fair trial?

Keep in mind that most if not all trials are already decided when any defendant goes into any court and the house always wins especially when the Stock Market is involved.

All of this is done under the order and watchful eye of the U.S. Supreme Court: LINK

Challenge!

SEE IF YOU CAN FIND ANY ETHICS RULES THAT ARE NOT VIOLATED IN EVERY CASE!  LINK

NOTICE THAT ALL OF THE ETHICS RULES ARE UNDER A FOREIGN MONARCH LAW CALLED VATICAN CITY!

Published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America.

02-12-2019