Published on 08-06-2015 by the American Herald

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The Articles of Confederation of 1781 as amended on August 5th, 2015.

The Confederation Party (Party) convened a Political Convention yesterday to amend the original Articles of Confederation. The Party members were moving so fast that the last version of the Articles of Confederation were so outdated that many amendments were necessary. The amendments and re-organization will benefit many people regardless of status and is a platform that deals with today’s problems instead of worrying about what happened way back when..

EMPLOYMENT

There are so many connections on linkedin it is getting harder and harder to keep up with them all.  The Party knows that many are looking for work and would love to hire them. The problem is getting them paid. The Party is reaching out to the International Community to possibly assist the Party and Government in resolving the following problems.

1: Many Party members have earned, not created out of thin air, millions of Continental Dollars and are millionaires. The problem is moving and exchanging of the currency and moving the currency where it can be spent. The currency comes in digital, paper and soon to be coin.

United Nations Membership

2: The Government of The United States of America has sent its declaration to the United Nations for membership. Ban Ki Moon never contacted this Government and the Party Members heard that the bid for membership was thwarted meaning re-directed outside of United Nation thereby violating its rules. 

War of Attrition

3: The Dutch operating Manhattan Island have been doing everything they can to place as many roadblocks as they can to make sure this Government never functions nor does any good for its country.  This Government approached the city of Washington D.C. for a reciprocity agreement in dealing with automobile registration. This Government can tell when the Dutch of Manhattan Island interfere because the once very interested city administrator begins to move away slowly rather then just saying no or not interested.

Please keep in mind that this Government is trying to operate legally when dealing with automobile registration, insurance etc… Every attempt to operate legally is stopped by the Dutch of Manhattan. The Dutch attempt to dominate and extort this Government claiming that it does not recognize the Government of The United States of America, and then makes legal moves to attempt to stop it which is recognition.  It is like dealing with someone that is bi-polar.

4: The Party does have a Public Bank, (LINK) however it does not have a currency code and all of the universal transit lines are being blocked by the Dutch of Manhattan. There are no universal transit lines that can be used to pay people for their work. This monopoly blocks the Government from paying people which results in no medical care, no way to travel, no way to pay bills with its own currency. It also denies a Nationality forcing its people into a resident alien status under Manhattan Island which is human trafficking. These forced legal conflicts are also called agitation or inciting a conflict with intent to profile by the Dutch of Manhattan Island. The Dutch of Manhattan Island are engaging in a war of attrition against The United States of America and the Government thereof. The Dutch of Manhattan Island, completely foreign to America, through a war of attrition against this Government, are violating the fundamental principles of the Organization of American States. The Organization of American States (OAS) was created to protect America, however, the OAS literally protects the Dutch of Manhattan Island against the American States.

Organization of American States

5: The Organization of American States are in violation of their own charter which null and voids its charter. It is a front organization for the Dutch of Manhattan Island.  The Dutch of Manhattan Island have failed to legally challenge this Government in any forum, venue or jurisdiction. It has accepted and acknowledged its existence and decided to make a war of attrition rather than embracing the fundamental principles of peace as its advertises to the rest of the world.  The Dutch of Manhattan Island and its version of the United States advertise and claim to be the champions of Human Rights and Democracy, however, behind the scenes, it has systematically destroyed the reputation of the United Nations to a point where it no longer functions effectively nor operates under the basic principles that it was founded under. 

Legal Defiance

This Government and Party will remain defiant of criminal activity. No matter how hard the Dutch of Manhattan Island attempt to agitate, incite or whatever means its uses to attempt to push this Government and Party to violence, criminal activity, or corruption, this Government and Party will remain defiant against tyranny to the end. For the International Community to continue to remain silent and indifferent towards the war of attrition currently being waged against this Government and Party is an act of complicity with the tyranny which violates the basic principles of the charter of the United Nations. The U.S. government (Manhattan Island company) has corrupted itself and is taking the rest of the worlds countries down with it.  

Repentance

Under the rule of repentance, when a people decide not to follow those at war with the Most High, it is up to those at war with the Most High to classify those in repentance as Neutral. This Party and Government refuses to follow those at war with the Most High off a cliff of destruction. A war of attrition against those refusing to follow? 

IN CONCLUSION

The Party and the Government of The United States of America is asking the International Community to intervene in this war of attrition against this Government and Party waged by the Dutch of Manhattan Island. The Dutch of Manhattan Island do not have the legal right to intervene in the affairs of this Government nor wage war against America for its own selfish and greedy reasons. This Government and Party will not indulge people in their addictions of materialism which strips the natural resources of this country, Africa and many other countries. We use what we need and leave the rest for the next generation. Greed, insecurity, fear, cruelty and violence is the way of Manhattans Islands version of the UNITED STATES. It is not the way of its people. When is it time to intervene, many countries have watched this Government grow and have embraced its existence. This Government is now asking the International Community to intervene and stop this war of attrition against it.

The Confederation Party

08-06-2015

Published on 07-31-2015 by the American Herald

Dear Readers,

Starting from the last posting, LINK

Here is another traffic stop situation and the man was apparently compliant with all State statutes. That compliance cost him his life.

and again, here are some of the comments under the video that have a completely different tone to them.

Published on 07-31-2015 by the American Herald

Dear Readers:

An article came out in the Blaze that was entitled “

Woman Argues Laws Don’t Apply to Her Because She’s a ‘Free Inhabitant’ — Watch How Well That Goes Over With Officer    LINK

This newspaper heard something in the video that was very revealing, around the 4:31 mark of the video, the officer uses the term “Pain Compliance”. LINK TO VIDEO

Now the woman may or may not have a crazy claim that being a “free inhabitant”, however, a well trained Human Rights Defender looks through all of the theatrics and watches both sides of the confrontation.

1: The officer did not have to tow the vehicle, it was registered and insured according to our sources.

2: The officer started an investigation without probable cause to do so. There were no weapons in the car, no accident had occurred, no alcohol, no illegal drugs, the automobile was not being used as a weapon endangering the public safety. No aggressive driving, the automobile did not fit any description of being used in a bank robbery or any other crime.  There were no wants or warrants.

3: However, the officer used the terms “Impeding an investigation” and “pain compliance”. The American Herald agrees that the conflict is easy to make fun of if there is an individual that is benefiting from the violence of the people protecting them.  Sacrifice and Possession Cannibalization in the American Society!

The situation, no matter how crazy people sound in their claims, did not have to turn violent. The term “Pain Compliance” was used.

Pain compliance is a euphemism ^[1] for the use of torture^[2][3] to control a person^[4][5] or animal. The stimulus can be manual (brute force, placing pressure on painful areas, or use of painful hyperextension or hyperflexion on joints),^[6] use tools such as a whip or electroshock weapon, or use chemicals such as tear gas or pepper spray.

The purpose of pain compliance is to direct the actions of the subject, and to this end, the pain is lessened or removed when compliance is achieved. This provides incentive to the subject to carry out the action required. LINK

Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment.

Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain and possibly injury to an organism, usually to one who is physically restrained or otherwise under the torturer’s control or custody and unable to defend against what is being done to him or her. LINK

The woman asked for a superior several times. There was no reason for this situation to escalate the way it did. All the officer could have done to save his ego was write a ticket and let the courts settle the matter. 

Here are some questions and answers to contemplate.

1: Which industry has full control over the Department of Motor Vehicles?

A: Insurance Industry

2: Who is passing the laws in that State?

A: The lobbyists including but not limited to insurance companies, LINK

3: Which industry has full control over all State legislatures?

A: Insurance industry because they insure the States.

The real reason this woman was tortured through pain compliance was because she failed to purchase a certain product whether it was a license, or other product. People will claim that she was disobeying the law. However, when a private corporation is passing the laws, then is it really a law?

Once people get passed the crazy sounding claim by the woman about not having to comply with U.S. laws, and dig a little deeper into the issue, you can clearly see that the people behind the curtain causing these conflicts are simply cashing in on pain compliance.  Watch what happens in the future when pain compliance is used under the excuse that someone did not buy an insurance policy under the Affordable Care Act that no one read what was written by the insurance industry in that act.

Hopefully by now everyone can see what it is really like to have a monopoly over commerce and what kind of tyranny that can be enforced on anyone regardless of how compliant they are to the law.

If you read some of the comments under the particular video, you will see all kinds of cruel and unusual statements.

07-31-2015

Published on 07-21-2015 by the American Herald

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Wesley Clark, a former 4 Star General of the Army and currently working for Blackstone has been found to be inciting violence by and between the American Society and the U.S. Military.

Wesley Clark has not offered any reason why he has turned against the American Society nor the U.S. Military on behalf of a third party. However, he has obviously made a political decision that does not involve the survival of the U.S. Military nor the American Society. If the American Society is wiped out, the U.S. Military no longer has any support and therefore the U.S. Military is gone. Whatever political decision that was made by Wesley Clark, to continue to use the U.S. Military credentials to incite is considered sedition against the U.S. Military and the American Society.

It would be best for Wesley Clark to come clean with whom he is working for and why. Inciting violence against soldiers in the U.S. Military perpetrated by fear caused by Wesley Clark would be considered an act of betrayal against those soldiers that supported Wesley Clark for so many years.

Loyalty cannot be demanded, loyalty has always been earned and that fact has been proven over and over in history. The ignorant are the ones that believe that they can force others to think a certain way that would be acceptable to the people that Wesley Clark is now supporting outside of the American Society and the U.S. Military.

Wesley Clark has officially claimed exile from the American Society and the U.S. Military by inciting violence by and between the two in an effort to destroy both which has rendered Wesley Clark “stateless”. This means Wesley Clark, in his own words is not a U.S. citizen nor a resident of any of the U.S. states in the American Society. Wesley Clark is foreign to both. This decision was made by Wesley Clark alone and that decision should be honored by the American Society and the U.S. Military.

07-21-2015

Published on 05-10-2015 by the American Herald

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

http://www.idahostatejournal.com/members/no-rules-of-the-road-sovereign-citizens-concern-law-enforcement/article_00c67b94-f610-11e4-9461-230fc604c423.html?utm_campaign=native_advertising&utm_medium=website&utm_source=front_page&utm_content=

Manhattan Island has apparently employed a police officer in his 30’s, one Ben Byrne to violate International Covenants, Human Rights and the lieber code.

“Byrne, a reserve officer with the Apex, North Carolina Police Department and a current anti-terrorism instructor, was the keynote speaker during the two-day Idaho Highway Safety Summit held at the Red Lion this week.”

“A 2014 survey by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism reported that law-enforcement agencies across the U.S. called the movement the single greatest threat to their communities, coming in way above Islamic terrorists.”

“He said sovereign citizens are right-wing extremists that reject the U.S. government and the laws of individual states.”

Hello Readers,

Please keep in mind that this Highway Safety Summit was not a summit, it was a trial on a certain group of people.

Does anyone remember when profiling was illegal, than somehow after 2001 profiling was O.K after the Manhattan Island performed a demolition of their own buildings?

The reason why people like Ben Byrne get away with this type of criminal activity is because the general population is not up to speed on their political and human rights. If the Idaho police were worth what they were paid, they would have arrested Ben Byrne at that moment for multiple violations of law from the local level to the Law of Nations.

CRIMES

1: The first crime is a hate crime committed by Ben Byrne. “In both crime and law, hate crime (also known as bias-motivated crime) is a usually violent, prejudice motivated crime that occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her perceived membership in a certain social group. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime”

“They are dangerous people and they believe that they’re smarter than you are,” Byrne told the crowd Tuesday.”

Ben Byrne is knowingly, intentionally and willfully converting all police and others in the State of Idaho into determined political assassins for political purposes in violation of:

source: https://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/110
Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (Lieber Code). 24 April 1863.

Section IX : Assassination – Art. 148.

Art. 148. The law of war does not allow proclaiming either an individual belonging to the hostile army, or a citizen, or a subject of the hostile government, an outlaw, who may be slain without trial by any captor, any more than the modern law of peace allows such intentional outlawry; on the contrary, it abhors such outrage. The sternest retaliation should follow the murder committed in consequence of such proclamation, made by whatever authority. Civilized nations look with horror upon offers of rewards for the assassination of enemies as relapses into barbarism.

“Byrne addressed common language and signs that identified sovereign citizens.”

Quote: A fraudulent registration plate affixed to a vehicle might be the first clue for law enforcement.

The plate may look like a slightly altered version of a legitimate registration and often contain words like “indigenous, sovereign, diplomatic, exempt or private property.”

Law enforcement officials who encounter sovereign citizens report that they refused to roll down their window or only rolled it down a matter of inches and then slid out a “Public Servant Questionnaire” asking for the officer’s full legal name, home address and other sensitive biographical information.
When stopped for traffic violations, sovereigns often ask for the officer’s oath of office or ask them to recite that oath, then they attempt to analyze words to differentiate between a “vehicle” and a “conveyance,” or “driving” versus “traveling.”

“What they are trying to do is get you to react, to confuse and intimidate you,” Byrne said.” End quote

International and Public Crimes committed by Ben Byrne in view of the Public and of the Idaho police force without arrest:

2: Inciting in a manner that is capable of disturbing the public peace:

A:  incites hatred against segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
B: assaults the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously maligning, or defaming segments of the population.

incite
1. verb in•cite \in-ˈsīt\
2. : to cause (someone) to act in an angry, harmful, or violent way
3. : to cause (an angry, harmful, or violent action or feeling)

General Public Knowledge of the ramifications suffered by the profiled in many cases:

Typically what happens when someone is profiled as a sovereign citizen domestic terrorist (profiled) is this:

1: A basic traffic stop involves anywhere from 2 to 15 police cars and 10 to 20 police officers with either their hands on their guns or guns drawn preparing to execute the profiled on a judgment under conviction of death that has already been rendered against the profiled.

The trial against the profiled has already happened without the knowledge of the profiled. The traffic laws and traffic court is a cover for the trial that has already occurred as being a domestic terrorist while the profiled is not present nor able to defend against the charges in violation of:

The International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights:

Article 14

1. All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal established by law. The press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice;
2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
3. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, everyone shall be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:
(a) To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him;
(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defense and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing;
(c) To be tried without undue delay;
(d) To be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it;

2: The profiled is then trafficked to an illegal private detention center because they exist privately within the metes and bounds of Manhattan Island claims of Dutch colonies within the U.S. states. The U.S. citizen has been trafficked to a Dutch Colony under the Manhattan Island charter of the patroons and remains in exile kept under an enormous bond, usually 10,000.00 or more in violation of:

Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 9
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

3: The profiled is held until found guilty in violation of:

Article 11
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

4: A lawyer is never offered to the profiled in violation of:

Article 14 Section 3 (d) of the Covenant for Civil and Political Rights: To be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it;

5: Then the local Sheriff’s Department will drive by the profiled wherein they reside really slow, making it obvious that the profiled is being watched for months for intimidation purposes in violation of:

Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or cor-respondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

6: The profiled is placed out of work, the profiled cannot support their family, the profiled is shunned by the rest of the community because it is to too dangerous for the profiled to associate with others because of the danger that the police will shoot the profiled at anytime and may hit others in the process in violation of:

Article 23

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

7: The profiled is now living in fear for their lives every day in America in violation of:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,”
The International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights lays out international standards of due process. These include but not limited to:
Article 9

1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law
3. Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release. It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgment.

Now, therefore, Ben Byrne, the Idaho State Journal, and the State of Idaho are hereby placed on notice that these aforementioned crimes have been committed and are still being committed within the metes and bounds of the State of Idaho. This news paper publication will be sent to the Human Rights Defenders and Human Rights Tribunal for review and possible action taken against Ben Byrne and the Editor and Publisher of the Idaho State Journal for inciting, and multiple human rights violations.

Further, an investigation for violations of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights against people that have already suffered these acts of violence and breach of the public peace may be implemented. Both Ben Byrne and the Idaho State Journal could face up to 75,000.00 dollars in damages per violation if found guilty that will be placed in a relief fund for victims of these crimes.

Public Notice

The Human Rights Tribunal was created under Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by publication and operates under the rules of Article 9, 14 and 15 of  The International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights of which lays out international standards of due process and other rules and process:

Court of record process: http://humanrightstribunal.international/?page_id=201

05-10-2015

Published on 05-02-2015 by the American Herald

Report # 407B

On or about 05-02-2015, one of the Human Rights Defenders came across an article dated April 30th, 2015: LINK

It seems pretty harmless at first sight and it appears that Bit Coin is getting a little boost which is a good thing. 

Then another article came up that was published on Jun 28, 2014: LINK

“That bill [also referred to as AB-129]– as we’ve discussed previously — effectively makes it simpler for state residents to use alternative currencies by nullifying an old bill that deemed anything but the use of the United States dollar as legal.

These alternative currencies include but are not limited to Starbucks Stars, Amazon Coins, and yes, even bitcoin and other cryptographic currencies.”

Then another article was found that was published on May 6, 2014:  LINK

The Big Picture Behind the News of China’s Bitcoin Bans

This is the most peculiar part of these articles: Look at the dates!

California must have had a crystal ball when it came to that legislation dealing with crypto currency. China bans bitcoin and a month and a half later, California passes it.

Then almost a year later, China and Manhattan Island go into partnership with Bitcoin. This miraculous event really benefits California in a big way or does it?

Questions:

1: Why would Manhattan Island start backing Bitcoin?

2: How did California know Bitcoin was going to be backed by a Central Bank when in the article about China, the central bank there said it was not created by the central bank so therefore was not legal tender?

3: We know that Manhattan is a foreign country under the Charter of the Patroons, and that charter came from the Netherlands. Many people believe that Manhattan Island is a part of the United States and Manhattan Island was taken over by the British. However, the British Company that took over Manhattan Island from the Dutch Company was a franchise of the Dutch. Is Manhattan Island a part of the United States or is it the United States as opposed to one of the United States or these United States?

Here is a link to a book published in 1998 which is a book about the legal basis on the term Nonresident Alien which shows all of the cases and filings on the specific term:

LINK

Watch out though, you might be a terrorist if you read this book and start talking about it.

Here is the most disturbing question in this whole report:

4: Did Manhattan Island influence the passing of the state law in California or did it order the passing of the state law?

Either way, if there was an influence or order or any other connection, that would mean that California’s law was and still is a foreign law to California. That would mean that the residents of California are under foreign law and the Police are enforcing foreign law against California’s residents. If that is the case, is all law in California foreign law to its residents and to U.S. citizens or is it? If someone were a state citizen and not a U.S. citizen, would the state statutes be considered foreign to the state citizen? According to the information in the book, the California state statutes and every other state statutes would be foreign to the state citizens if the statutes were passed under the dictatorial influence of a foreign power ie….using the foreign powers currency. Going a little further in this line of thinking, this situation would also mean that U.S. citizens would be foreign to the states of the union according to the book above, which would explain why the Bill of Rights would not apply and federal restrictions over U.S. citizens would also not apply in any court. 

If the courts were enforcing foreign law, this would make the courts foreign to the states wherein they do business.

Now, here are some other more disturbing questions:

5: How can a president claim to be a president of the United States and also a president of the United States of America at the same time? If the states of the union are foreign to the United States with respect to private international law.

6: How can the people vote for a foreign president if they domicile within one of the states of the union?

7: If that is the case, why is the commander in chiefs flag in a state and county court room and in each state capital building?

8: Why would the states pass foreign law?

Now this line of thinking would explain this issue: LINK

West Baltimore offers vivid reminder of failed mass incarceration policy.

The legal implications of this line of questioning and thinking are astronomical and do boggle the mind.

05-02-2015