Published on 08-16-2015 by the American Herald
Dear Readers,
Before we get started, this newspaper would just like to say that anyone who invents a product should have exclusive rights to that product from 17 to 20 years under a patent system.
That being said, a confidential informant came to this newspaper with a certain discovery. It was a patent number on a automobile registration form. It seemed like nothing at first, however, after copying the patent number and looking it up, the trail lead to other related reports that were and could be of concern. LINK TO THE PATENT in PDF
If anyone looks at this particular patent, it reads that Standard Register has been assigned the patent to the little sticker on the automobile license plate. Of course, Standard Register will have to pay royalties to the inventor. Then when looking into Standard Register further to see what kind of company it is, it shows the company has been in business since 1912. COMPANY PROFILE BROCHURE and looking a little further we found some other basic information: LINK– So we looked up a man named Gerard D. Sowar: LINK and a particular name came up on the right of the page: Joseph P. Morgan who happened to be Dir., President and Chief Executive Officer, The Standard Register Company. However, Joseph P. Morgan never comes up on the Standard Register Executive Leadership list on the website: LINK
Meanwhile, The Standard Register Corp. launches a new product and then files for bankruptcy:
1: LINK Standard Register To Launch SMART Franchise
2: :LINK, BANKRUPTCY FILING NOTICE
3: LINK Fahlgren Aids Standard Register Bankruptcy
4:LINK Delaware bankruptcy judge tentatively OKs sale of Standard Register assets to Taylor Corp.
5: LINK Taylor-Corporation-Acquires-Standard-Register
Does anyone see Joseph P. Morgan mentioned anywhere in those series of documents other than leaving the corp.? We tracked down Mr. Morgan that was the CEO of a failed company that had a stock price of 0.03 cents per stock.
LINK: Uniguest-Names-Joseph-P.-Morgan-Jr as CEO.
The newspaper wanted to know where all of this sideshow was headed when this came up: LINK CREDIT CARD WITH DRIVER’S LICENSE.
Then the newspaper wanted to know what a driver’s license really is and this came up: LINK Systems and methods for identifying an individual. So we can conclude that a Driver’s License is not really permission to drive a motor vehicle as widely believed. It is really permission for a state to interrogate and invade human privacy rights under the cover of responsible party doctrine. Someone really twisted it’s original intent into a weapon against humanity rather then a proper governing tool to protect the innocent.
Abstract
The present application relates to systems and methods using biometric data of an individual for identifying the individual and/or verifying the identity of an individual. These systems and methods are useful for, amongst many applications, more secure identification of high-risk individuals attempting to gain access to an entity, transport, information, location, security organization, law enforcement organization, transaction, services, authorized status, and/or funds.
Then the newspaper wanted to know if there was a direct link between patents and the Department of Motor Vehicles of any U.S. state and this comes up: LINK Texas DMV improves state vehicle registration sticker and it is advertised like everyone wanted a new sticker when in reality, ask anyone on the street and they will tell you it is just another way to take their money. Did Texas really need to improve the sticker or did it have to gain another patented product and was it forced to sell only patented products to the public? Did the patent time run out on the older sticker?
States can own patents: LINK Code of Virginia Title 2.2. Administration of Government Chapter 28. General Provisions § 2.2-2822. Ownership and use of patents and copyrights developed by certain public employees; Creative Commons copyrights.
Guide to sell your patent: LINK
“A patent is a right to exclude others from practicing your unique invention. It provides the right to ask the court to force infringers to pay a reasonable royalty and/or issue an injunction preventing future infringement. So, the marketability and value of the patent depends on its infringement status.”
Which brings the readers to this video:
“Atlanta TV just aired one of the best take downs, ALEC Exposed”
In the aforementioned video, there are private corporations telling the states to pass certain laws that number 1: Gives the corporation preferential treatment;#2 and just so happens that the states buy patented products which creates monopolies and a corporate operated state thereby forcing the General Public to buy those products under the force and cover of state law.
Did anyone test these products before they entered into the “forced sale arena” to the General Public?
How much more is the price increased by having to cover the license costs and royalty fees that are in existence with selling patented products?
Why wouldn’t the states sell products that the patent has run out and under public domain?
The security of the public domain product could be the brand of the state meaning its Great Seal or other brand secured by the state.
There was further investigation that linked the terms “Dejure” and “Defacto” that a lot of people are using to describe United States inc. The term defacto has a specific meaning when it comes to “Driver’s License” which may clear up a lot of confusion among those that use the aforementioned terms on a daily basis:LINK
“Because a large number of countries, including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, have no national identification cards and because of the widespread use of cars, driver’s licenses are often used as a de facto standard form of identification. Most identification cards and driver’s license cards are credit card size—the “ID-1″ size and shape (85.60 × 53.98 mm (3.370 × 2.125 in) with rounded corners with a radius of 2.88–3.48 mm.) defined in ISO/IEC 7810.”
and
“North America
In the United States and Canada, driver’s licenses are issued by the states or provinces, respectively, and do not look the same nationwide. They are also used as a de facto identification document. For persons not fit, not eligible, or who otherwise choose not to acquire a driver’s license, state (United States) or provincial (Canada) agencies – usually the same as the issuer of driver licenses – will issue an identification card with similar attributes to a driver’s license. Identification cards do not enable a person to operate a motor vehicle, a fact typically noted on the ID via the phrase ‘Not a driver’s license’ or similar wording. Florida law allows driver without a physical drivers license to temporarily use drivers permit or current driving records.”
(Monarchs do not have authority over true Nationals of countries)
This is where the concept came from:
“Karl Benz, inventor of the modern automobile, had to receive written permission from the Grand Ducal authorities to operate his car on public roads in 1888 after residents complained about the noise and smell of his Motorwagen.[1] Up until the start of the 20th century, European authorities issued licenses to drive motor vehicles similarly ad hoc, if at all.”
Now this Government happens to agree with Ron Paul when it comes to the “Real ID Act”. LINK because of the tracking chip and many other issues. Since the U.S. government is not a National Government, the US House had to pass this type of resolution: LINK because Manhattan Island is under a Monarch form of rule and so is its company known as the UNITED STATES INC. therefore it cannot create a Nationality for its subjects.
After reading all of this information and the real reason why “Driver’s Licenses” exist mainly to consent to Human Rights privacy violations and to make a whole lot of money on patented products, the proper move would be for the National Government of The United States of America to come up with a proper solution to the problem:
National Identification Order link
True Nationals of countries do not need permission to move in their own country.
Article 13
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Therefore the General Post Master Council ORDER does have standing as a solution to the following publishing: LINK
08-15-2014